WESTERN SPIRITOPATHOLOGY IN THE FACE OF THE GLOBAL AFRICAN RENAISSANCE: TOWARDS A COAFRWOLOGICAL LOCALSTRATEGY OF SOVEREIGNITY.
- Alphonse Mpeke

- 15 août
- 5 min de lecture

We are conscious of who we deeply are now...
Western Spiritopsychopathology in the Face of the Global African Renaissance: Towards a Coafrwological Localstrategy of Sovereignty
Mpékè-Ntonga Métila Mé Nyodi-Alphonse Mpeke- Founder of Coafrwology – The CEADA – and other paradigmatic and socio-ethnic Pan-African concepts. Director, Institute for Contemporary African World Studies (IEMAC/ICAWS)
Abstract
The African continent stands at a historic juncture where centuries of imposed dependency are being actively dismantled. This article examines the growing incapacity of former colonial powers—particularly France—to maintain their traditional hegemony in Africa. The analysis is rooted in Coafrwology, a Pan-African science of order, justice, healing, restoration, and global African renaissance, and advances the concept of Localstrategy as an alternative to Western geostrategy.
Central to this shift is the recognition of Western spiritopsychopathology: a pathological pattern of domination and resource predation embedded in the political, economic, and cultural behaviors of imperialist powers. By contrasting this pathology with Africa’s emergent Coafrwological paradigms, the paper argues that sovereignty in the 21st century will be secured not through mimicry of external models but through localized, culturally anchored strategies that build from the grassroots upward.
Through a case analysis of recent events in the Sahel, the study identifies the structural, cognitive, and spiritual mechanisms driving the Global African Renaissance. The findings reveal that Africa’s sovereignty is increasingly multidimensional—political, economic, cultural, and epistemic—and that the local, rather than the global, is becoming the primary arena of strategic action.
Keywords: Global African Renaissance, Coafrwology, Localstrategy, Western spiritopsychopathology, Pan-African sovereignty, AES, cognitive decolonization, African paradigms.
1. Introduction
Africa’s historical trajectory has been marked by systemic attempts to fragment its political structures, erode its cultural foundations, and exploit its material resources. For over five centuries, the continent has been subjected to spiritopsychopathological aggression—an ingrained Western compulsion to dominate, extract, and control.
While the colonial and neocolonial systems have relied on centralized geostrategic planning to impose external control, contemporary Africa is beginning to reverse this logic through
Localstrategy—a grassroots, Pan-Africanist approach grounded in the lived realities of African communities.
The recent failures of foreign-backed coups in the Sahel exemplify a deeper continental shift: Africa is no longer merely resisting; it is constructing its own strategic architecture, one that is culturally authentic, self-sustaining, and intellectually sovereign.
2. Literature Review: From Decolonial Thought to Coafrwology
African liberation thought has long critiqued the intellectual and structural legacies of colonialism. Kwame Nkrumah argued for continental unity as the basis of political sovereignty (1963). Frantz Fanon highlighted the psychological deformations produced by colonization (1961). Cheikh Anta Diop reclaimed African historical agency (1981), while Samir Amin proposed economic delinking from the capitalist core (1988).
More recently, Achille Mbembe has explored postcolonial governance and the politics of the local (2013). However, while these thinkers laid crucial foundations, Coafrwology advances the conversation by offering a systemic, integrative science that combines cognitive decolonization, community-centered governance, spiritual restoration, and collective healing into a unified Pan-African sovereignty framework.
3. Theoretical Framework
3.1 Western Spiritopsychopathology
Defined here as a culturally embedded pathology driving the historical and contemporary compulsion of Western powers to dominate and exploit Africa. It encompasses:
Spiritual alienation – the denial or suppression of African spiritual systems in favor of Eurocentric epistemologies.
Psychological projection – framing Africa as “lacking” and “needing” Western intervention.
Systemic vampirism – the extraction of African resources and energies for the sustenance of Western economies.
3.2 Coafrwology
A Pan-African science dedicated to the restoration of African sovereignty across five interconnected dimensions:
Order – Building political systems rooted in African governance traditions and cultural legitimacy.
Justice – Redressing historical exploitation, dismantling neocolonial structures, and ensuring equitable resource distribution.
Restoration – Reclaiming African historical narratives, indigenous knowledge systems, and spiritual heritage.
Healing – Repairing the psychological, cultural, and intergenerational traumas inflicted by centuries of enslavement, colonization, and systemic oppression; restoring holistic well-being and social harmony.
Global African Renaissance – Positioning Africa as a fully sovereign, self-defining actor in global affairs, shaping the future on its own terms.
3.3 Localstrategy
An operational paradigm replacing Western geostrategy with a community-first, bottom-up approach characterized by:
Contextual sovereignty – Strategies designed for the socio-cultural realities of each locality.
Community power hubs – Localities as centers of economic, cultural, and political strength.
Holistic development – Integrating spiritual, social, and economic well-being into governance and security.
4. Case Analysis: The Sahel as a Sovereignty Laboratory
Events in Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger (2020–2024) demonstrate how integrated African defense systems can preempt and neutralize foreign interference. These states have leveraged:
Cross-border Pan-African alliances (AES) to reduce dependence on former colonial powers.
Narrative sovereignty—controlling the ideological framing of their political transitions.
Localstrategic economic measures—including renegotiation of resource contracts and currency autonomy initiatives.
5. Implications & Policy Recommendations
For African states:
Institutionalize Localstrategy training programs for political leaders, military planners, and community organizers.
Establish regional confederations for collective economic and security sovereignty.
Integrate Coafrwological studies—including healing methodologies—into national education systems.
For external actors:
Abandon paternalistic policy frameworks.
Engage African states as equal partners under mutually beneficial terms.
Recognize the legitimacy of African epistemologies in diplomacy and development.
6. Conclusion
The Global African Renaissance is not an aspirational vision but an ongoing process of structural, cognitive, and spiritual emancipation. The inclusion of Healing as a central pillar of Coafrwology affirms that sovereignty is incomplete without repairing the deep psychological and cultural wounds inflicted by centuries of oppression.
The decline of Western spiritopsychopathology’s influence over Africa signals the maturation of a new era—one in which sovereignty is grounded in self-definition rather than external validation. Africa is no longer content to be an object of strategy; it is becoming the author of its own future.
Bibliography and References
Books and Monographs
Diop, Cheikh Anta. The African Origin of Civilization: Myth or Reality. Lawrence Hill & Company, 1981.
Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press, 1961.
Nkrumah, Kwame. Africa Must Unite. Panaf Books, 1963.
Amin, Samir. Delinking: Towards a Polycentric World. Zed Books, 1988.
Mbembe, Achille. Critique of Black Reason. Duke University Press, 2013.
Rodney, Walter. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications, 1972.
Mudimbe, V. Y. The Invention of Africa: Gnosis, Philosophy, and the Order of Knowledge. Indiana University Press, 1988.
Journal Articles and Papers
8. Ajayi, J. F. Ade. “Decolonizing Knowledge and African Intellectual Traditions.” African Studies Review, vol. 61, no. 2, 2018, pp. 1–18.9.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo. “The Decolonial Turn in African Political Economy: Local Strategies for Sovereignty.” Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 38, no. 3, 2020, pp. 315–334.10.
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi. “Postcolonial African Philosophy and the Question of Healing.” Philosophy and Social Criticism, vol. 42, no. 5, 2016, pp. 511–528.
Reports and Institutional Sources
11. African Union Commission. Agenda 2063: The Africa We Want. African Union, 2015.12. ECOWAS. Community Security and Governance Strategies in West Africa. ECOWAS Commission Report, 2021.
Conceptual/Framework References
13. Mpeke, Mpékè-N M M N-A. Coafrwology: Science of African Order, Justice, Healing, and Restoration. ICAWS Publications, 2024.
14. Mpeke, M-N M MN-A. “Localstrategy: Pan-African Approaches to Sovereignty.” Global African Renaissance Review, vol. 1, no. 1, 2025, pp. 45–67.

.png)









Commentaires